FS50131785: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50131785 | |dn_ref=FS50131785 | ||
|dn_date=19 | |dn_date=19 November 2007 | ||
|dn_pa=Gloucestershire County Council | |dn_pa=Gloucestershire County Council | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary=The complainants asked the council for the information it had compiled on options for saving £10 million from its adult services budget. The council withheld the requested information under s36 (prejudice to the effective conduct of public affairs). The Commissioner decided that information which directly related to savings options was correctly exempted. He decided that part of the information was not exempt under s36 and should be released. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50131785.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50131785.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:29, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50131785
- Date: 19 November 2007
- Public Authority: Gloucestershire County Council
- Summary: The complainants asked the council for the information it had compiled on options for saving £10 million from its adult services budget. The council withheld the requested information under s36 (prejudice to the effective conduct of public affairs). The Commissioner decided that information which directly related to savings options was correctly exempted. He decided that part of the information was not exempt under s36 and should be released.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 36 - Complaint Partly Upheld - Find other matching decisions
