FS50131421: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50131421 | |dn_ref=FS50131421 | ||
|dn_date=23 | |dn_date=23 July 2007 | ||
|dn_pa=Hearing Aid Council | |dn_pa=Hearing Aid Council | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant asked for legal advice obtained by the public authority about specific issues. The public authority declined to disclose the information relying upon the section 42 exemption and claiming that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. Subsequently the public authority claimed that it did not want to confirm or deny whether it held the requested information. | |dn_summary=The complainant asked for legal advice obtained by the public authority about specific issues. The public authority declined to disclose the information relying upon the section 42 exemption and claiming that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. Subsequently the public authority claimed that it did not want to confirm or deny whether it held the requested information. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs50131421.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs50131421.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision1 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 1 | |dnd_section=FOI 1 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision2 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 17 | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision3 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 42 | |dnd_section=FOI 42 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:26, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50131421
- Date: 23 July 2007
- Public Authority: Hearing Aid Council
- Summary: The complainant asked for legal advice obtained by the public authority about specific issues. The public authority declined to disclose the information relying upon the section 42 exemption and claiming that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. Subsequently the public authority claimed that it did not want to confirm or deny whether it held the requested information.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2 Template:DNDecision3
