FS50130129: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
 
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50130129
|dn_ref=FS50130129
|dn_date=16/06/2008
|dn_date=16 June 2008
|dn_pa=Warwickshire County Council
|dn_pa=Warwickshire County Council
|dn_summary=The Complainant requested a section of an internal audit report of a contract between the council and a private company for the purposes of highway maintenance. The council refused the request claiming that it engaged the exemptions of the Act in section 43 (commercial prejudice) and section 36 (prejudice to the effective conduct of public affairs). The Commissioner's decision is that section 43 does not apply to the information. He has also decided that although section 36 is applicable, the public interest in maintaining the exemption does not outweigh the public interest in disclosing the information.
|dn_summary=The Complainant requested a section of an internal audit report of a contract between the council and a private company for the purposes of highway maintenance. The council refused the request claiming that it engaged the exemptions of the Act in section 43 (commercial prejudice) and section 36 (prejudice to the effective conduct of public affairs). The Commissioner's decision is that section 43 does not apply to the information. He has also decided that although section 36 is applicable, the public interest in maintaining the exemption does not outweigh the public interest in disclosing the information.
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 36
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|2=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 43
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 36
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:29, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50130129
  • Date: 16 June 2008
  • Public Authority: Warwickshire County Council
  • Summary: The Complainant requested a section of an internal audit report of a contract between the council and a private company for the purposes of highway maintenance. The council refused the request claiming that it engaged the exemptions of the Act in section 43 (commercial prejudice) and section 36 (prejudice to the effective conduct of public affairs). The Commissioner's decision is that section 43 does not apply to the information. He has also decided that although section 36 is applicable, the public interest in maintaining the exemption does not outweigh the public interest in disclosing the information.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]