FS50127256: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Text replace - "DNDecision4" to "DNDecision")
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50127256.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50127256.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision1
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 30
|dnd_section=FOI 30
|dnd_finding=Partly Upheld
|dnd_finding=Partly Upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision2
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 21
|dnd_section=FOI 21
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision3
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld

Latest revision as of 23:29, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50127256
  • Date: 14 October 2008
  • Public Authority: Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Service
  • Summary: The complainant requested information about two investigations carried out by the public authority. In connection with the first of these, a 1970s fraud case, the Commissioner finds that the public authority is correct in stating that this information is not held, but that it breached section 1(1)(a) when earlier incorrectly suggesting that this information was held. In connection with the second of these, a 1980s murder investigation, the Commissioner finds that the public authority has applied the exemption provided by section 30(1) correctly. The Commissioner has also found that the public authority failed to comply with the procedural requirements of the Act in its handling of the request.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Retrieved from "https://foiwiki.com/foiwiki/index.php?title=FS50127256&oldid=16415"