FS50112855: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision4" to "DNDecision") |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 17 | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:51, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50112855
- Date: 26 March 2007
- Public Authority: Ofcom
- Summary: The complainant contacted the Commissioner following the failure of Ofcom to provide any of the information requested. Following the intervention of the Commissioner, Ofcom provided some of the information requested and refused the rest under section 12. The Commissioner finds that section 12 has been applied correctly but that Ofcom failed to comply with sections 1 and 17 in its initial response. These breaches have since been remedied and no further action is required
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2 Template:DNDecision3
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
