FS50100134: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_100134.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_100134.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision1
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 1
|dnd_section=FOI 1
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision2
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:26, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50100134
  • Date: 29 August 2006
  • Public Authority: Doncaster and Bassetlaw NHS Trust
  • Summary: The complainant requested information contained within a report following an investigation into the death of his wife. The request was refused as the information had been destroyed in line with the records management policy at the time. The Commissioner is satisfied that the public authority do not hold the information requested and did not hold it at the time the request was made. However, the Trust did breach s.17 of the Act by not providing an adequate refusal notice.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]