FS50097811: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50097811 | |dn_ref=FS50097811 | ||
|dn_date= | |dn_date=4 September 2007 | ||
|dn_pa=Financial Services Authority | |dn_pa=Financial Services Authority | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant sought information from the Financial Services Authority ( | |dn_summary=The complainant sought information from the Financial Services Authority (“FSA“) that was generated by and/or considered during the FSA investigation of his complaint against HSBC Investment Bank plc. The FSA refused to disclose certain information relying on section 44 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 citing section 348 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (“FSMA”) as the relevant statutory bar. The Commissioner, after investigation and upon considering the relevant documents, finds that the FSA were correct in their application of the exemption. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs50097811.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs50097811.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 44 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:26, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50097811
- Date: 4 September 2007
- Public Authority: Financial Services Authority
- Summary: The complainant sought information from the Financial Services Authority (“FSA“) that was generated by and/or considered during the FSA investigation of his complaint against HSBC Investment Bank plc. The FSA refused to disclose certain information relying on section 44 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 citing section 348 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (“FSMA”) as the relevant statutory bar. The Commissioner, after investigation and upon considering the relevant documents, finds that the FSA were correct in their application of the exemption.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 44 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
