Difference between revisions of "FS50094583"

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Text replace - "DNDecision4" to "DNDecision")
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50094583.pdf
 
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50094583.pdf
 
}}
 
}}
{{DNDecision1
+
{{DNDecision
 
|dnd_section=FOI 41
 
|dnd_section=FOI 41
 
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
 
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
 
}}
 
}}
{{DNDecision2
+
{{DNDecision
 
|dnd_section=FOI 42
 
|dnd_section=FOI 42
 
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
 
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
 
}}
 
}}
{{DNDecision3
+
{{DNDecision
 
|dnd_section=FOI 43
 
|dnd_section=FOI 43
 
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
 
|dnd_finding=Not upheld

Latest revision as of 20:25, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50094583
  • Date: 5 July 2007
  • Public Authority: Financial Services Authority
  • Summary: The complainant requested a report and supporting information regarding Equitable Life as mentioned on the FSA’s website. The FSA disclosed an edited version of the report but withheld the remainder of the information under sections 41, 42, 44 and 43 of the Act. The Commissioner investigated the application of all four exemptions and found that they had all been applied correctly and in relation to sections 42 and 43 that in all circumstances of the case the public interest favoured maintaining the exemption.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]