FS50094472: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50094472.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50094472.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 17 | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 41 | |dnd_section=FOI 41 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 43 | |dnd_section=FOI 43 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:25, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50094472
- Date: 12 November 2007
- Public Authority: Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
- Summary: The complainant was refused information about the application of the Department’s Coal Investment Aid scheme to the Aberpergwyn Colliery. The Commissioner decided that information contained within reports to the department from its consultants had been correctly withheld using the section 41 exemption but that the Department had been in breach of section 17 of the Act in not including section 41 in its refusal notice. He also decided that other information, about the offer of aid and employment at the mine, had been wrongly withheld as the section 43 exemption was not engaged.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 41 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 43 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
