FS50094472: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(XML import)
(CSV import)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50094472
|dn_ref=FS50094472
|dn_date=12/11/2007
|dn_date=12 November 2007
|dn_pa=Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
|dn_pa=Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
|dn_summary= including section 41 in its refusal notice. He also decided that other information, about the offer of aid and employment at the mine, had been wrongly withheld as the section 43 exemption was not engaged.
|dn_summary=The complainant was refused information about the application of the Department’s Coal Investment Aid scheme to the Aberpergwyn Colliery. The Commissioner decided that information contained within reports to the department from its consultants had been correctly withheld using the section 41 exemption but that the Department had been in breach of section 17 of the Act in not including section 41 in its refusal notice. He also decided that other information, about the offer of aid and employment at the mine, had been wrongly withheld as the section 43 exemption was not engaged.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50094472.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50094472.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision1
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision2
|dnd_section=FOI 41
|dnd_section=FOI 41
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision3
|dnd_section=FOI 43
|dnd_section=FOI 43
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Revision as of 22:24, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50094472
  • Date: 12 November 2007
  • Public Authority: Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
  • Summary: The complainant was refused information about the application of the Department’s Coal Investment Aid scheme to the Aberpergwyn Colliery. The Commissioner decided that information contained within reports to the department from its consultants had been correctly withheld using the section 41 exemption but that the Department had been in breach of section 17 of the Act in not including section 41 in its refusal notice. He also decided that other information, about the offer of aid and employment at the mine, had been wrongly withheld as the section 43 exemption was not engaged.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2 Template:DNDecision3