FS50094226: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
 
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50094226
|dn_ref=FS50094226
|dn_date=05/02/2007
|dn_date=5 February 2007
|dn_pa=Pesticides Safety Directorate
|dn_pa=Pesticides Safety Directorate
|dn_summary=The complainant requested the public authority to provide it with lists of safety studies carried out on two named pesticide ingredients. The public authority refused, relying upon an exemption under section 22 of the
|dn_summary=The complainant requested the public authority to provide it with lists of safety studies carried out on two named pesticide ingredients. The public authority refused, relying upon an exemption under section 22 of the
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 17
|dnd_section=FOI 22
|2=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:25, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50094226
  • Date: 5 February 2007
  • Public Authority: Pesticides Safety Directorate
  • Summary: The complainant requested the public authority to provide it with lists of safety studies carried out on two named pesticide ingredients. The public authority refused, relying upon an exemption under section 22 of the
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]