FS50094226: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision2" to "DNDecision") |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 17 | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 23:06, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50094226
- Date: 5 February 2007
- Public Authority: Pesticides Safety Directorate
- Summary: The complainant requested the public authority to provide it with lists of safety studies carried out on two named pesticide ingredients. The public authority refused, relying upon an exemption under section 22 of the
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
