FS50092315: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50092315.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50092315.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision1
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 42
|dnd_section=FOI 42
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision2
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:25, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50092315
  • Date: 29 January 2007
  • Public Authority: Charity Commission
  • Summary: The complainant asked the public authority for information relating to correspondence between the Commissioners and Trustees. The public authority withheld it under section 42 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 claiming legal professional privilege and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissioner did not uphold the complaint but noted that the public authority had not met the obligations placed upon it by section 17.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]