FS50092069: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50092069 | |dn_ref=FS50092069 | ||
|dn_date=11/06/2007 | |dn_date=11/06/2007 | ||
|dn_pa=Sunderland City Council | |dn_pa=Sunderland City Council | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary=ng the section 38 exemption. However, he has decided that the Council was in breach of section 17 (1) of the Act as it failed to supply a refusal notice within 20 working days. It also failed to complete a review of its decision within the time specified in its complaints procedure. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50092069.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50092069.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 38 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 41 | |||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 22:04, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50092069
- Date: 11/06/2007
- Public Authority: Sunderland City Council
- Summary: ng the section 38 exemption. However, he has decided that the Council was in breach of section 17 (1) of the Act as it failed to supply a refusal notice within 20 working days. It also failed to complete a review of its decision within the time specified in its complaints procedure.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 38 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 41 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions