FS50087341: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50087341 | |dn_ref=FS50087341 | ||
|dn_date=29 | |dn_date=29 June 2006 | ||
|dn_pa=London Borough of Richmond upon Thames | |dn_pa=London Borough of Richmond upon Thames | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant made a request on 6 May 2005 for information relating to the handling of a previous Freedom of Information request that he had made. Some information was released, but some, contained in letters dated between 3 June 2006 and 25 July 2005, was withheld under section 42 (legal professional privilege). After an investigation the Commissioner has decided that the exemption was applied correctly, but that the response was sent outside the 20 working day time limit. The Information Tribunal has ruled on this decision and has partly upheld this appeal. | |dn_summary=The complainant made a request on 6 May 2005 for information relating to the handling of a previous Freedom of Information request that he had made. Some information was released, but some, contained in letters dated between 3 June 2006 and 25 July 2005, was withheld under section 42 (legal professional privilege). After an investigation the Commissioner has decided that the exemption was applied correctly, but that the response was sent outside the 20 working day time limit. The Information Tribunal has ruled on this decision and has partly upheld this appeal. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_fs50087341.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_fs50087341.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision1 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 10 | |dnd_section=FOI 10 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision2 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 16 | |dnd_section=FOI 16 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision3 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 17 | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision4 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 42 | |dnd_section=FOI 42 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:23, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50087341
- Date: 29 June 2006
- Public Authority: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames
- Summary: The complainant made a request on 6 May 2005 for information relating to the handling of a previous Freedom of Information request that he had made. Some information was released, but some, contained in letters dated between 3 June 2006 and 25 July 2005, was withheld under section 42 (legal professional privilege). After an investigation the Commissioner has decided that the exemption was applied correctly, but that the response was sent outside the 20 working day time limit. The Information Tribunal has ruled on this decision and has partly upheld this appeal.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2 Template:DNDecision3 Template:DNDecision4
