FS50086169: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50086169 | |dn_ref=FS50086169 | ||
|dn_date=23 | |dn_date=23 October 2006 | ||
|dn_pa=Chief Officer South Yorkshire Police | |dn_pa=Chief Officer South Yorkshire Police | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information about which safety camera was responsible for the highest number of prosecutions. The public authority withheld this information under section 31 of the Act. After consideration of whether this exemption was applied correctly, including consideration of the public interest, the Commissioner has upheld the decision of the public authority to withhold this information. This decision is currently under appeal to the Information Tribunal. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested information about which safety camera was responsible for the highest number of prosecutions. The public authority withheld this information under section 31 of the Act. After consideration of whether this exemption was applied correctly, including consideration of the public interest, the Commissioner has upheld the decision of the public authority to withhold this information. This decision is currently under appeal to the Information Tribunal. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_fs50086169.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_fs50086169.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision1 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 30 | |dnd_section=FOI 30 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:23, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50086169
- Date: 23 October 2006
- Public Authority: Chief Officer South Yorkshire Police
- Summary: The complainant requested information about which safety camera was responsible for the highest number of prosecutions. The public authority withheld this information under section 31 of the Act. After consideration of whether this exemption was applied correctly, including consideration of the public interest, the Commissioner has upheld the decision of the public authority to withhold this information. This decision is currently under appeal to the Information Tribunal.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
