FS50081276: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:02, 3 May 2010

Case Ref: FS50081276
Date: 30/07/2007
Public Authority: Ministry of Justice
Summary: ptions, the Commissioner is satisfied that the exemptions cited were properly applied and that the information is therefore exempt.
View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 21 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 36 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{DNSummaryBox
+	{{DNSummaryBox
 |dn_ref=FS50081276
 |dn_date=30/07/2007
 |dn_pa=Ministry of Justice
-|dn_summary=The complainant requested a copy of the information created as result of his correspondence with the Magistrates� Court Service Inspectorate concerning the Chester, Ellesmere Port and Neston Magistrates� Court during the period 2003/2004. The public authority provided the complainant with some information in full, further information in redacted form and withheld the remainder. The public authority explained that the information withheld was exempt under sections 21 and 36. The Commissioner notes that in dealing with the request, the public authority breached sections 10 and 17 of the Act by failing to respond in time and not giving a full explanation. Having investigated the application of the exemptions, the Commissioner is satisfied that the exemptions cited were properly applied and that the information is therefore exempt.
+|dn_summary=ptions, the Commissioner is satisfied that the exemptions cited were properly applied and that the information is therefore exempt.
 |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50081276.pdf
 }}
 {{DNDecision
-|1=FOI 36
+|dnd_section=FOI 10
-|2=Not upheld
+|dnd_finding=Not upheld
+}}
+{{DNDecision
+|dnd_section=FOI 17
+|dnd_finding=Not upheld
+}}
+{{DNDecision
+|dnd_section=FOI 21
+|dnd_finding=Not upheld
+}}
+{{DNDecision
+|dnd_section=FOI 36
+|dnd_finding=Not upheld
 }}