FS50078020: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(XML import)
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50078020
|dn_ref=FS50078020
|dn_date=23/03/2006
|dn_date=23 March 2006
|dn_pa=Milton Keynes Council
|dn_pa=Milton Keynes Council
|dn_summary=A request for detailed information relating to income from parking services provided by the Public Authority was made on the 20/04/05. The Public Authority responded to the request on the 26/05/05 after a complaint made by the complainant. On the 02/06/05, the complainant wrote to the Public Authority reiterating his request as he felt that there was not enough detail in the information that had been provided; the information was then provided to the complainant's satisfaction on the 24/09/05. The decision notice upholds the complaint against the Public Authority and finds that it was in breach of section 10. No steps are required as the information had been released.
|dn_summary=A request for detailed information relating to income from parking services provided by the Public Authority was made on the 20/04/05. The Public Authority responded to the request on the 26/05/05 after a complaint made by the complainant. On the 02/06/05, the complainant wrote to the Public Authority reiterating his request as he felt that there was not enough detail in the information that had been provided; the information was then provided to the complainant's satisfaction on the 24/09/05. The decision notice upholds the complaint against the Public Authority and finds that it was in breach of section 10. No steps are required as the information had been released.

Latest revision as of 23:23, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50078020
  • Date: 23 March 2006
  • Public Authority: Milton Keynes Council
  • Summary: A request for detailed information relating to income from parking services provided by the Public Authority was made on the 20/04/05. The Public Authority responded to the request on the 26/05/05 after a complaint made by the complainant. On the 02/06/05, the complainant wrote to the Public Authority reiterating his request as he felt that there was not enough detail in the information that had been provided; the information was then provided to the complainant's satisfaction on the 24/09/05. The decision notice upholds the complaint against the Public Authority and finds that it was in breach of section 10. No steps are required as the information had been released.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]