FS50078010: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_fs50078010.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_fs50078010.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 31 | |dnd_section=FOI 31 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:23, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50078010
- Date: 24 July 2006
- Public Authority: The Lord Chancellor's Advisory Committee for Cheshire on Justices of the Peace
- Summary: The complaint requested copies of material created as a result of a complaint he had submitted to the Authority in relation to the manner in which a particular Magistrates Court dealt with its business. The authority provided the complainant with a copy of the information but with redactions to two sentences of one document, explaining that the information was exempt under section 31. Having investigated, the Commissioner is satisfied that the exemption was properly applied.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 31 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
