FS50071188: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50071188.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50071188.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision1
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 40(2)
|dnd_section=FOI 40(2)
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision2
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 10(1)
|dnd_section=FOI 10(1)
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 22:23, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50071188
  • Date: 22 September 2008
  • Public Authority: Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
  • Summary: The complainant requested internal documents relating to the drafting of a consultation document on employment tribunals and the name(s) of the individuals involved. The Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) informed the complainant that aside from the information disclosed to him, no further documents are held relating to the drafting of the consultation document. BERR also refused to disclose the individuals name under section 40 of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated and finds that no further information is held regarding the consultation document and that BERR were correct in the application of section 40 to the individual’s name.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]