FS50069396: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50069396 | |dn_ref=FS50069396 | ||
|dn_date= | |dn_date=1 March 2006 | ||
|dn_pa=Cyngor Cymuned Llandysul | |dn_pa=Cyngor Cymuned Llandysul | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested the sight documentation relating to the placement of a BT pole and land ownership. The council offered photocopies of the documentation at 10 pence per sheet but refused sight of the information. The Commissioner has decided that the Council should have given preference to the complainant's request to see the information, and has therefore upheld the complaint. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested the sight documentation relating to the placement of a BT pole and land ownership. The council offered photocopies of the documentation at 10 pence per sheet but refused sight of the information. The Commissioner has decided that the Council should have given preference to the complainant's request to see the information, and has therefore upheld the complaint. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_69396d.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_69396d.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision1 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 11 | |dnd_section=FOI 11 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:21, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50069396
- Date: 1 March 2006
- Public Authority: Cyngor Cymuned Llandysul
- Summary: The complainant requested the sight documentation relating to the placement of a BT pole and land ownership. The council offered photocopies of the documentation at 10 pence per sheet but refused sight of the information. The Commissioner has decided that the Council should have given preference to the complainant's request to see the information, and has therefore upheld the complaint.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
