FS50069395: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50069395 | |dn_ref=FS50069395 | ||
|dn_date=19 | |dn_date=19 May 2006 | ||
|dn_pa=Warwickshire County Council | |dn_pa=Warwickshire County Council | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information relating to a school near to his home. The complainant made further requests to the same theme and the public authority deemed those requests as vexatious. In reaching a decision, the Commissioner took into account the tone and affect of the correspondence sent to the public authority by the complainant. It was felt that the criteria set out in Awareness Guidance 22 was met and the complaint was not upheld, the Commissioner finding the public authority had correctly applied section 14. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested information relating to a school near to his home. The complainant made further requests to the same theme and the public authority deemed those requests as vexatious. In reaching a decision, the Commissioner took into account the tone and affect of the correspondence sent to the public authority by the complainant. It was felt that the criteria set out in Awareness Guidance 22 was met and the complaint was not upheld, the Commissioner finding the public authority had correctly applied section 14. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_fs50069395.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_fs50069395.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision1 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 14 | |dnd_section=FOI 14 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:21, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50069395
- Date: 19 May 2006
- Public Authority: Warwickshire County Council
- Summary: The complainant requested information relating to a school near to his home. The complainant made further requests to the same theme and the public authority deemed those requests as vexatious. In reaching a decision, the Commissioner took into account the tone and affect of the correspondence sent to the public authority by the complainant. It was felt that the criteria set out in Awareness Guidance 22 was met and the complaint was not upheld, the Commissioner finding the public authority had correctly applied section 14.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
