FS50067001: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50067001 | |dn_ref=FS50067001 | ||
|dn_date=16 | |dn_date=16 May 2005 | ||
|dn_pa=Inland Revenue | |dn_pa=Inland Revenue | ||
|dn_summary=Complainant requested information regarding action taken by the Inland Revenue concerning specific instances of alleged failed standards. The Inland Revenue stated that this information was not held. The Decision Notice found that the Inland Revenue was not in breach of s.1. The complainant has lodged an appeal. | |dn_summary=Complainant requested information regarding action taken by the Inland Revenue concerning specific instances of alleged failed standards. The Inland Revenue stated that this information was not held. The Decision Notice found that the Inland Revenue was not in breach of s.1. The complainant has lodged an appeal. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 1 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:22, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50067001
- Date: 16 May 2005
- Public Authority: Inland Revenue
- Summary: Complainant requested information regarding action taken by the Inland Revenue concerning specific instances of alleged failed standards. The Inland Revenue stated that this information was not held. The Decision Notice found that the Inland Revenue was not in breach of s.1. The complainant has lodged an appeal.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: dn.pdf
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 1 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
