FS50062508: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision4" to "DNDecision") |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |dnd_section=FOI 40 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:50, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50062508
- Date: 6 April 2006
- Public Authority: Warwickshire Police Authority
- Summary: The complainant requested information relating to a complaint he had made arising out of disciplinary action taken against him by the police authority. Although he was provided with some information, a report about him was withheld in reliance on exemptions relating to Investigations, Court Records and Legal Professional Privilege. Following the Commissioner's intervention, the Authority provided the complainant with a redacted copy of the withheld information, but it became apparent that an unredacted copy of the withheld report had previously been sent to the complainant. The Commissioner therefore found that the Authority has incorrectly attempted to rely upon the stated exemptions.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2 Template:DNDecision3
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
