FER0159319: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(XML import)
(XML import)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FER0159319
|dn_ref=FER0159319
|dn_date=02/02/2010
|dn_date=FER015931902/02/2010
|dn_pa=Planning Service
|dn_pa=FER015931902/02/2010Planning Service
|dn_summary=The complainant made a verbal request to inspect information held by the Planning Service on Planning Application file T199/0394. The Planning Service permitted the complainant to view the file but withheld some of the information contained within it on the basis that the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Planning Service failed to explain or demonstrate why the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied to the withheld information in this case. It therefore breached Regulations 5(1) and (2) in failing to make that information available to the complainant within twenty working days of the request. He has therefore ordered the Planning Service to make the withheld information available for inspection by the complainant.
|dn_summary=FER015931902/02/2010Planning ServiceThe complainant made a verbal request to inspect information held by the Planning Service on Planning Application file T199/0394. The Planning Service permitted the complainant to view the file but withheld some of the information contained within it on the basis that the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Planning Service failed to explain or demonstrate why the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied to the withheld information in this case. It therefore breached Regulations 5(1) and (2) in failing to make that information available to the complainant within twenty working days of the request. He has therefore ordered the Planning Service to make the withheld information available for inspection by the complainant.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fer_0159319.pdf
|dn_url=FER015931902/02/2010Planning ServiceThe complainant made a verbal request to inspect information held by the Planning Service on Planning Application file T199/0394. The Planning Service permitted the complainant to view the file but withheld some of the information contained within it on the basis that the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Planning Service failed to explain or demonstrate why the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied to the withheld information in this case. It therefore breached Regulations 5(1) and (2) in failing to make that information available to the complainant within twenty working days of the request. He has therefore ordered the Planning Service to make the withheld information available for inspection by the complainant.http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fer_0159319.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=EIR 5(1)
|dnd_section=FER015931902/02/2010Planning ServiceThe complainant made a verbal request to inspect information held by the Planning Service on Planning Application file T199/0394. The Planning Service permitted the complainant to view the file but withheld some of the information contained within it on the basis that the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Planning Service failed to explain or demonstrate why the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied to the withheld information in this case. It therefore breached Regulations 5(1) and (2) in failing to make that information available to the complainant within twenty working days of the request. He has therefore ordered the Planning Service to make the withheld information available for inspection by the complainant.http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fer_0159319.pdfEIR 5(1)
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=FER015931902/02/2010Planning ServiceThe complainant made a verbal request to inspect information held by the Planning Service on Planning Application file T199/0394. The Planning Service permitted the complainant to view the file but withheld some of the information contained within it on the basis that the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Planning Service failed to explain or demonstrate why the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied to the withheld information in this case. It therefore breached Regulations 5(1) and (2) in failing to make that information available to the complainant within twenty working days of the request. He has therefore ordered the Planning Service to make the withheld information available for inspection by the complainant.http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fer_0159319.pdfEIR 5(1)Upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=EIR 5(2)
|dnd_section=FER015931902/02/2010Planning ServiceThe complainant made a verbal request to inspect information held by the Planning Service on Planning Application file T199/0394. The Planning Service permitted the complainant to view the file but withheld some of the information contained within it on the basis that the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Planning Service failed to explain or demonstrate why the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied to the withheld information in this case. It therefore breached Regulations 5(1) and (2) in failing to make that information available to the complainant within twenty working days of the request. He has therefore ordered the Planning Service to make the withheld information available for inspection by the complainant.http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fer_0159319.pdfEIR 5(1)UpheldEIR 5(2)
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=FER015931902/02/2010Planning ServiceThe complainant made a verbal request to inspect information held by the Planning Service on Planning Application file T199/0394. The Planning Service permitted the complainant to view the file but withheld some of the information contained within it on the basis that the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Planning Service failed to explain or demonstrate why the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied to the withheld information in this case. It therefore breached Regulations 5(1) and (2) in failing to make that information available to the complainant within twenty working days of the request. He has therefore ordered the Planning Service to make the withheld information available for inspection by the complainant.http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fer_0159319.pdfEIR 5(1)UpheldEIR 5(2)Upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=EIR 12(5)(b)
|dnd_section=FER015931902/02/2010Planning ServiceThe complainant made a verbal request to inspect information held by the Planning Service on Planning Application file T199/0394. The Planning Service permitted the complainant to view the file but withheld some of the information contained within it on the basis that the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Planning Service failed to explain or demonstrate why the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied to the withheld information in this case. It therefore breached Regulations 5(1) and (2) in failing to make that information available to the complainant within twenty working days of the request. He has therefore ordered the Planning Service to make the withheld information available for inspection by the complainant.http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fer_0159319.pdfEIR 5(1)UpheldEIR 5(2)UpheldEIR 12(5)(b)
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=FER015931902/02/2010Planning ServiceThe complainant made a verbal request to inspect information held by the Planning Service on Planning Application file T199/0394. The Planning Service permitted the complainant to view the file but withheld some of the information contained within it on the basis that the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Planning Service failed to explain or demonstrate why the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied to the withheld information in this case. It therefore breached Regulations 5(1) and (2) in failing to make that information available to the complainant within twenty working days of the request. He has therefore ordered the Planning Service to make the withheld information available for inspection by the complainant.http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fer_0159319.pdfEIR 5(1)UpheldEIR 5(2)UpheldEIR 12(5)(b)Upheld
}}
}}
[[Category:DNTest]]
[[Category:DNTest]]

Revision as of 00:18, 3 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FER0159319
  • Date: FER015931902/02/2010"FER015931902/02/2010" contains a sequence that could not be interpreted against an available match matrix for date components.
  • Public Authority: FER015931902/02/2010Planning Service
  • Summary: FER015931902/02/2010Planning ServiceThe complainant made a verbal request to inspect information held by the Planning Service on Planning Application file T199/0394. The Planning Service permitted the complainant to view the file but withheld some of the information contained within it on the basis that the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Planning Service failed to explain or demonstrate why the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied to the withheld information in this case. It therefore breached Regulations 5(1) and (2) in failing to make that information available to the complainant within twenty working days of the request. He has therefore ordered the Planning Service to make the withheld information available for inspection by the complainant.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: "FER015931902/02/2010Planning ServiceThe complainant made a verbal request to inspect information held by the Planning Service on Planning Application file T199/0394. The Planning Service permitted the complainant to view the file but withheld some of the information contained within it on the basis that the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Planning Service failed to explain or demonstrate why the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied to the withheld information in this case. It therefore breached Regulations 5(1) and (2) in failing to make that information available to the complainant within twenty working days of the request. He has therefore ordered the Planning Service to make the withheld information available for inspection by the complainant.http" has not been listed as valid URI scheme. [FER015931902/02/2010Planning ServiceThe complainant made a verbal request to inspect information held by the Planning Service on Planning Application file T199/0394. The Planning Service permitted the complainant to view the file but withheld some of the information contained within it on the basis that the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Planning Service failed to explain or demonstrate why the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied to the withheld information in this case. It therefore breached Regulations 5(1) and (2) in failing to make that information available to the complainant within twenty working days of the request. He has therefore ordered the Planning Service to make the withheld information available for inspection by the complainant.http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fer_0159319.pdf]
  • Section of Act / Finding: FER015931902/02/2010Planning ServiceThe complainant made a verbal request to inspect information held by the Planning Service on Planning Application file T199/0394. The Planning Service permitted the complainant to view the file but withheld some of the information contained within it on the basis that the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Planning Service failed to explain or demonstrate why the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied to the withheld information in this case. It therefore breached Regulations 5(1) and (2) in failing to make that information available to the complainant within twenty working days of the request. He has therefore ordered the Planning Service to make the withheld information available for inspection by the complainant.http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fer_0159319.pdfEIR 5(1) - Using "FER015931902/02/2010Planning ServiceThe complainant made a verbal request to inspect information held by the Planning Service on Planning Application file T199/0394. The Planning Service permitted the complainant to view the file but withheld some of the information contained within it on the basis that the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Planning Service failed to explain or demonstrate why the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied to the withheld information in this case. It therefore breached Regulations 5(1) and (2) in failing to make that information available to the complainant within twenty working days of the request. He has therefore ordered the Planning Service to make the withheld information available for inspection by the complainant.http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fer_0159319.pdfEIR 5(1)" as property chain is not permitted during the annotation process. - [[Property:FER015931902/02/2010Planning ServiceThe complainant made a verbal request to inspect information held by the Planning Service on Planning Application file T199/0394. The Planning Service permitted the complainant to view the file but withheld some of the information contained within it on the basis that the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Planning Service failed to explain or demonstrate why the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied to the withheld information in this case. It therefore breached Regulations 5(1) and (2) in failing to make that information available to the complainant within twenty working days of the request. He has therefore ordered the Planning Service to make the withheld information available for inspection by the complainant.http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fer_0159319.pdfEIR 5(1)|Find other matching decisions]]
  • Section of Act / Finding: FER015931902/02/2010Planning ServiceThe complainant made a verbal request to inspect information held by the Planning Service on Planning Application file T199/0394. The Planning Service permitted the complainant to view the file but withheld some of the information contained within it on the basis that the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Planning Service failed to explain or demonstrate why the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied to the withheld information in this case. It therefore breached Regulations 5(1) and (2) in failing to make that information available to the complainant within twenty working days of the request. He has therefore ordered the Planning Service to make the withheld information available for inspection by the complainant.http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fer_0159319.pdfEIR 5(1)UpheldEIR 5(2) - Using "FER015931902/02/2010Planning ServiceThe complainant made a verbal request to inspect information held by the Planning Service on Planning Application file T199/0394. The Planning Service permitted the complainant to view the file but withheld some of the information contained within it on the basis that the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Planning Service failed to explain or demonstrate why the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied to the withheld information in this case. It therefore breached Regulations 5(1) and (2) in failing to make that information available to the complainant within twenty working days of the request. He has therefore ordered the Planning Service to make the withheld information available for inspection by the complainant.http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fer_0159319.pdfEIR 5(1)UpheldEIR 5(2)" as property chain is not permitted during the annotation process. - [[Property:FER015931902/02/2010Planning ServiceThe complainant made a verbal request to inspect information held by the Planning Service on Planning Application file T199/0394. The Planning Service permitted the complainant to view the file but withheld some of the information contained within it on the basis that the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Planning Service failed to explain or demonstrate why the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied to the withheld information in this case. It therefore breached Regulations 5(1) and (2) in failing to make that information available to the complainant within twenty working days of the request. He has therefore ordered the Planning Service to make the withheld information available for inspection by the complainant.http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fer_0159319.pdfEIR 5(1)UpheldEIR 5(2)|Find other matching decisions]]
  • Section of Act / Finding: FER015931902/02/2010Planning ServiceThe complainant made a verbal request to inspect information held by the Planning Service on Planning Application file T199/0394. The Planning Service permitted the complainant to view the file but withheld some of the information contained within it on the basis that the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Planning Service failed to explain or demonstrate why the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied to the withheld information in this case. It therefore breached Regulations 5(1) and (2) in failing to make that information available to the complainant within twenty working days of the request. He has therefore ordered the Planning Service to make the withheld information available for inspection by the complainant.http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fer_0159319.pdfEIR 5(1)UpheldEIR 5(2)UpheldEIR 12(5)(b) - Using "FER015931902/02/2010Planning ServiceThe complainant made a verbal request to inspect information held by the Planning Service on Planning Application file T199/0394. The Planning Service permitted the complainant to view the file but withheld some of the information contained within it on the basis that the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Planning Service failed to explain or demonstrate why the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied to the withheld information in this case. It therefore breached Regulations 5(1) and (2) in failing to make that information available to the complainant within twenty working days of the request. He has therefore ordered the Planning Service to make the withheld information available for inspection by the complainant.http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fer_0159319.pdfEIR 5(1)UpheldEIR 5(2)UpheldEIR 12(5)(b)" as property chain is not permitted during the annotation process. - [[Property:FER015931902/02/2010Planning ServiceThe complainant made a verbal request to inspect information held by the Planning Service on Planning Application file T199/0394. The Planning Service permitted the complainant to view the file but withheld some of the information contained within it on the basis that the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Planning Service failed to explain or demonstrate why the exception in Regulation 12(5)(b) applied to the withheld information in this case. It therefore breached Regulations 5(1) and (2) in failing to make that information available to the complainant within twenty working days of the request. He has therefore ordered the Planning Service to make the withheld information available for inspection by the complainant.http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fer_0159319.pdfEIR 5(1)UpheldEIR 5(2)UpheldEIR 12(5)(b)|Find other matching decisions]]