FER0106205: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FER0106205 | |dn_ref=FER0106205 | ||
|dn_date=21 | |dn_date=21 August 2006 | ||
|dn_pa=Worcestershire County Council | |dn_pa=Worcestershire County Council | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested a copy of a letter of complaint sent to the Highways Partnership, Worcestershire County Council. The request was refused under regulation 13, on the basis that it constituted the personal information of the author. After reviewing the information and receiving clarification from the authority, the Commissioner found that the authority had complied with the legislation, redaction was not possible, and therefore, the authority was correct to refuse access to the information in its entirety. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested a copy of a letter of complaint sent to the Highways Partnership, Worcestershire County Council. The request was refused under regulation 13, on the basis that it constituted the personal information of the author. After reviewing the information and receiving clarification from the authority, the Commissioner found that the authority had complied with the legislation, redaction was not possible, and therefore, the authority was correct to refuse access to the information in its entirety. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/dn_fer0106205.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/dn_fer0106205.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision1 | ||
|dnd_section=EIR 13 | |dnd_section=EIR 13 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:20, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FER0106205
- Date: 21 August 2006
- Public Authority: Worcestershire County Council
- Summary: The complainant requested a copy of a letter of complaint sent to the Highways Partnership, Worcestershire County Council. The request was refused under regulation 13, on the basis that it constituted the personal information of the author. After reviewing the information and receiving clarification from the authority, the Commissioner found that the authority had complied with the legislation, redaction was not possible, and therefore, the authority was correct to refuse access to the information in its entirety.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
