FER0087781: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
 
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FER0087781
|dn_ref=FER0087781
|dn_date=02/06/2006
|dn_date=2 June 2006
|dn_pa=Mid Suffolk County Council
|dn_pa=Mid Suffolk County Council
|dn_summary=The Council initially responded to a request relating to a planning application by stating that the information was available for inspection at its premises. However, following the involvement of the Commissioner, the council has contacted the complainant and stated that the information was not held. The complainant disputed this, but there is no evidence available to suggest that the council does not hold the information. The Commissioner has conducted that the initial response was not in accordance with the Regulations initially, but that no action is required by the council as this breach has been resolved.
|dn_summary=The Council initially responded to a request relating to a planning application by stating that the information was available for inspection at its premises. However, following the involvement of the Commissioner, the council has contacted the complainant and stated that the information was not held. The complainant disputed this, but there is no evidence available to suggest that the council does not hold the information. The Commissioner has conducted that the initial response was not in accordance with the Regulations initially, but that no action is required by the council as this breach has been resolved.
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=EIR 14
|dnd_section=EIR 12
|2=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=EIR 14
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:20, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FER0087781
  • Date: 2 June 2006
  • Public Authority: Mid Suffolk County Council
  • Summary: The Council initially responded to a request relating to a planning application by stating that the information was available for inspection at its premises. However, following the involvement of the Commissioner, the council has contacted the complainant and stated that the information was not held. The complainant disputed this, but there is no evidence available to suggest that the council does not hold the information. The Commissioner has conducted that the initial response was not in accordance with the Regulations initially, but that no action is required by the council as this breach has been resolved.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]