FER0071457: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:27, 3 May 2010

Case Ref: FER0071457
Date: 04/09/2006
Public Authority: Department for Communities and Local Government
Summary: sioner decided that the Planning Inspectorate had applied regulation 12(4)(e) correctly and that the public interest was best served by maintaining the exception from the requirement to release information in regulation 5(1) of those regulations.
View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Section of Act / Finding: EIR 12(4)(e) - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{DNSummaryBox
+	{{DNSummaryBox
 |dn_ref=FER0071457
 |dn_date=04/09/2006
 |dn_pa=Department for Communities and Local Government
-|dn_summary=The complainant made a request for a copy of the Planning Inspector�s report of a public inquiry held into proposed motorway service areas on the M1 and A1M in North Yorkshire. The Planning Inspectorate withheld the report until the planning decision had been made, on the basis that it was an internal communication under regulation 12(4)(e) of the EIR. The Commissioner decided that the Planning Inspectorate had applied regulation 12(4)(e) correctly and that the public interest was best served by maintaining the exception from the requirement to release information in regulation 5(1) of those regulations.
+|dn_summary=sioner decided that the Planning Inspectorate had applied regulation 12(4)(e) correctly and that the public interest was best served by maintaining the exception from the requirement to release information in regulation 5(1) of those regulations.
 |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/fs50071457_dn001.pdf
 }}
 {{DNDecision
-|1=EIR 12(4)(e)
+|dnd_section=EIR 12(4)(e)
-|2=Not upheld
+|dnd_finding=Not upheld
 }}