FER0071457: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FER0071457 | |dn_ref=FER0071457 | ||
|dn_date= | |dn_date=4 September 2006 | ||
|dn_pa=Department for Communities and Local Government | |dn_pa=Department for Communities and Local Government | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant made a request for a copy of the Planning | |dn_summary=The complainant made a request for a copy of the Planning Inspector’s report of a public inquiry held into proposed motorway service areas on the M1 and A1M in North Yorkshire. The Planning Inspectorate withheld the report until the planning decision had been made, on the basis that it was an internal communication under regulation 12(4)(e) of the EIR. The Commissioner decided that the Planning Inspectorate had applied regulation 12(4)(e) correctly and that the public interest was best served by maintaining the exception from the requirement to release information in regulation 5(1) of those regulations. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/fs50071457_dn001.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/fs50071457_dn001.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=EIR 12(4)(e) | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:20, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FER0071457
- Date: 4 September 2006
- Public Authority: Department for Communities and Local Government
- Summary: The complainant made a request for a copy of the Planning Inspector’s report of a public inquiry held into proposed motorway service areas on the M1 and A1M in North Yorkshire. The Planning Inspectorate withheld the report until the planning decision had been made, on the basis that it was an internal communication under regulation 12(4)(e) of the EIR. The Commissioner decided that the Planning Inspectorate had applied regulation 12(4)(e) correctly and that the public interest was best served by maintaining the exception from the requirement to release information in regulation 5(1) of those regulations.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: EIR 12(4)(e) - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
