FER0067951: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/67951_dn.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/67951_dn.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=EIR 5(1) | |dnd_section=EIR 5(1) | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:20, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FER0067951
- Date: 2 November 2005
- Public Authority: London Borough of Bromley
- Summary: The Complainant requested information regarding representations and objections to a Definite Map Modification Order. The Council disclosed a large number of documents but the Complainant alleged the Council was still withholding some documents. The Commissioner is satisfied with the Council's assurances that they do not hold any further information and that therefore they have satisfied r.5(1) of the EIR. The Information Tribunal has ruled on this decision and has upheld this appeal.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: EIR 5(1) - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
