FER0067003: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision2" to "DNDecision") |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/67003 dn.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/67003 dn.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=EIR 8(2)(b) | |dnd_section=EIR 8(2)(b) | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
Latest revision as of 23:20, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FER0067003
- Date: 20 July 2005
- Public Authority: Kings Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council
- Summary: The complainant alleged that the Council would not provide copies of a planning application file free of charge. Recent changes to the charging regime meant that the cost to the complainant for a file containing a decision notice, an A2 plan and 36 A4 sheets would reduce from £234 to £37. The Commissioner notes these changes and accepts that the Council has satisfied itself that its charges do not exceed a reasonable amount in accordance with Part 2, paragraph 8(3) of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: dn.pdf
- Section of Act / Finding: EIR 8(2)(b) - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: EIR 8(3) - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
