FER0061168: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
Line 6: Line 6:
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/61168 dn.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/61168 dn.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision1
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=EIR 8
|dnd_section=EIR 8
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:20, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FER0061168
  • Date: 20 July 2005
  • Public Authority: Kings Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council
  • Summary: The complainant alleged that the charges for providing copies of a planning application were excessive. The Commissioner notes recent reductions in these charges and accepts that the Council has satisfied itself that its charges do not exceed a reasonable amount in accordance with Part 2, paragraph 8(3) of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004. The complainant appealed to the Information Tribunal who upheld the appeal and issued a substitute notice, this is available at www.informationtribunal.gov.uk.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: dn.pdf