FAC0067277: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FAC0067277 | |dn_ref=FAC0067277 | ||
|dn_date=20 | |dn_date=20 July 2005 | ||
|dn_pa=Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea | |dn_pa=Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea | ||
|dn_summary=The complainants requested access to both their own social services records and those of a third party. The Council informed them that they did not hold this information. The Commissioner investigated the matter and was satisfied with the assurances by the Council that they do not hold information. | |dn_summary=The complainants requested access to both their own social services records and those of a third party. The Council informed them that they did not hold this information. The Commissioner investigated the matter and was satisfied with the assurances by the Council that they do not hold information. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/67277 | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/67277 dn.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
Latest revision as of 23:20, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FAC0067277
- Date: 20 July 2005
- Public Authority: Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
- Summary: The complainants requested access to both their own social services records and those of a third party. The Council informed them that they did not hold this information. The Commissioner investigated the matter and was satisfied with the assurances by the Council that they do not hold information.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: dn.pdf
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 1 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
