Consultation on Extension of Coverage of Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/consultations/foi/extension_of_foisa.asp
* Consultation document pack: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/07/20123725/0
* Online response form: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/consultations/foi/extension_of_foisa.asp


==A: Contractors who run privately managed prisons and provide prisoner escort services==
==A: Contractors who run privately managed prisons and provide prisoner escort services==


===invitation to comment on A===
===invitation to comment on A===
* More information on A: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/07/20123725/3


{| border="1" style="background: style="background: #71A6D2";
{| border="1" style="background: style="background: #71A6D2";
Line 14: Line 17:
*Is there a case either for or against extending coverage to private prisons and prison escort services that you wish to make?
*Is there a case either for or against extending coverage to private prisons and prison escort services that you wish to make?
*Are you able to provide any evidence to support your arguments?
*Are you able to provide any evidence to support your arguments?
*Are there any other comments you wish to make, including any on the partial Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at Annex B?"
*Are there any other comments you wish to make, including any on the partial Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at [http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/07/20123725/11 Annex B]?"
|-
|-
|}
|}
Line 21: Line 24:


==B: Contractors who build and/or maintain schools==
==B: Contractors who build and/or maintain schools==
* More information on B: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/07/20123725/4


===invitation to comment on B===
===invitation to comment on B===
Line 34: Line 39:
*Are you able to provide any evidence to support your arguments?
*Are you able to provide any evidence to support your arguments?
*Do you believe different thresholds for coverage (such as a different contract value and/or duration) should be set?
*Do you believe different thresholds for coverage (such as a different contract value and/or duration) should be set?
*Are there any other comments you wish to make, particularly on the partial Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at Annex B?"
*Are there any other comments you wish to make, particularly on the partial Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at [http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/07/20123725/11 Annex B]?"
|-
|-
|}
|}
Line 41: Line 46:


==C: Contractors who build and maintain hospitals==
==C: Contractors who build and maintain hospitals==
* More information on C: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/07/20123725/5


===invitation to comment on C===
===invitation to comment on C===
Line 54: Line 61:
* Are you able to provide any evidence to support your arguments?
* Are you able to provide any evidence to support your arguments?
* Do you believe different thresholds for coverage (such as different contract value and/or duration) should be set?
* Do you believe different thresholds for coverage (such as different contract value and/or duration) should be set?
* Are there any other comments you wish to make, particularly on the partial Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at Annex B?
* Are there any other comments you wish to make, particularly on the partial Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at [http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/07/20123725/11 Annex B]?
|-
|-
|}
|}
Line 62: Line 69:


==D: Leisure, sport and cultural trusts and bodies established by local authorities==
==D: Leisure, sport and cultural trusts and bodies established by local authorities==
* More information on D: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/07/20123725/6


===invitation to comment on D===
===invitation to comment on D===
Line 76: Line 85:
* Is there a case either for or against extending coverage to local authority trusts that you wish to make?
* Is there a case either for or against extending coverage to local authority trusts that you wish to make?
* Are you able to provide any evidence to support your arguments?
* Are you able to provide any evidence to support your arguments?
* Are there other points you wish to make, particularly on the partial Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at Annex B?"
* Are there other points you wish to make, particularly on the partial Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at [http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/07/20123725/11 Annex B]?"
|-
|-
|}
|}
Line 84: Line 93:


==E: Glasgow Housing Association==
==E: Glasgow Housing Association==
* More information on E: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/07/20123725/7
* Glasgow Housing Association already operates within the spirit of the Act


===invitation to comment on E===
===invitation to comment on E===
Line 96: Line 108:
* Is there a case either for or against extending coverage to GHA that you wish to make?
* Is there a case either for or against extending coverage to GHA that you wish to make?
* Are you able to provide any evidence to support your arguments?
* Are you able to provide any evidence to support your arguments?
* Are there other points you wish to make, particularly on the partial Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at Annex B?"
* Are there other points you wish to make, particularly on the partial Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at [http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/07/20123725/11 Annex B]?"
|-
|-
|}
|}
Line 103: Line 115:


==F: The Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland (‘ACPOS’)==
==F: The Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland (‘ACPOS’)==
* More information on F: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/07/20123725/8
* ACPOS already operates within the spirit of the Act


===invitation to comment on F===
===invitation to comment on F===
Line 115: Line 130:
* Is there a case either for or against extending coverage to ACPOS that you wish to make?
* Is there a case either for or against extending coverage to ACPOS that you wish to make?
* Are you able to provide any evidence to support your arguments?
* Are you able to provide any evidence to support your arguments?
* Are there any other points that you wish to make, particularly on the partial Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at Annex B?"
* Are there any other points that you wish to make, particularly on the partial Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at [http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/07/20123725/11 Annex B]?"
|-
|-
|}
|}
Line 122: Line 137:


==G: Contractors who build, manage and maintain trunk roads under private finance contracts==
==G: Contractors who build, manage and maintain trunk roads under private finance contracts==
* More information on G: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/07/20123725/9


===invitation to comment on G===
===invitation to comment on G===
Line 134: Line 151:
* Is there a case either for or against extending coverage to contractors who build, manage and maintain trunk roads under private finance contracts that you wish to make?
* Is there a case either for or against extending coverage to contractors who build, manage and maintain trunk roads under private finance contracts that you wish to make?
* Are you able to provide any evidence to support your arguments?
* Are you able to provide any evidence to support your arguments?
* Are there any other points you wish to make, particularly on the partial Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at Annex B?"
* Are there any other points you wish to make, particularly on the partial Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at [http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/07/20123725/11 Annex B]?"
|-
|-
|}
|}

Revision as of 01:03, 1 August 2010

A: Contractors who run privately managed prisons and provide prisoner escort services

invitation to comment on A

"We invite comments on any of the points made in this section, and also on the Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at Annex B which discusses the possible impact on extending coverage to the bodies concerned.

In particular we invite you to consider the following:

  • Are there any factual inaccuracies in our analysis?
  • Is there a case either for or against extending coverage to private prisons and prison escort services that you wish to make?
  • Are you able to provide any evidence to support your arguments?
  • Are there any other comments you wish to make, including any on the partial Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at Annex B?"

draft response to A

B: Contractors who build and/or maintain schools

invitation to comment on B

"We invite comments on any of the points made in this section, and also on the Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at Annex B which discusses the possible impact on extending coverage to the bodies concerned.

In particular we invite you to consider the following:

  • Are there any factual inaccuracies in our analysis?
  • Is there a case either for or against extending coverage to contractors that build and maintain schools that you wish to make?
  • Are you able to provide any evidence to support your arguments?
  • Do you believe different thresholds for coverage (such as a different contract value and/or duration) should be set?
  • Are there any other comments you wish to make, particularly on the partial Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at Annex B?"

draft response to B

C: Contractors who build and maintain hospitals

invitation to comment on C

We invite comments on any of the points made in this section, and also on the Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at Annex B which discusses the possible impact on extending coverage to the bodies concerned.

In particular we invite you to consider the following:

  • Are there any factual inaccuracies in our analysis?
  • Is there a case either for or against extending coverage to contracts who build and maintain hospitals that you wish to make?
  • Are you able to provide any evidence to support your arguments?
  • Do you believe different thresholds for coverage (such as different contract value and/or duration) should be set?
  • Are there any other comments you wish to make, particularly on the partial Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at Annex B?


draft response to C

D: Leisure, sport and cultural trusts and bodies established by local authorities

invitation to comment on D

"We invite comments on any of the points made abovein this section, and also on the Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at Annex B which discusses the possible impact on extending coverage to the bodies concerned.

In particular we invite you to consider the following:

  • Do you agree with the proposed criteria for identifying appropriate trusts? If not, what alternative criteria would you consider appropriate?
  • Do you consider setting a minimum level of annual public funding threshold practicable and reasonable – given that funding is subject to fluctuations?
  • Are there any factual inaccuracies in this analysis? In particular, are there any additional bodies which would meet the proposed definition in Annex A?
  • Is there a case either for or against extending coverage to local authority trusts that you wish to make?
  • Are you able to provide any evidence to support your arguments?
  • Are there other points you wish to make, particularly on the partial Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at Annex B?"


draft response to D

E: Glasgow Housing Association

invitation to comment on E

"We invite comments on any of the points made in this section, and also on the Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at Annex B which discusses the possible impact on extending coverage to the bodies concerned.

In particular we invite you to consider the following:

  • Are there any factual inaccuracies in this analysis?
  • Is there a case either for or against extending coverage to GHA that you wish to make?
  • Are you able to provide any evidence to support your arguments?
  • Are there other points you wish to make, particularly on the partial Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at Annex B?"

draft response to E

F: The Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland (‘ACPOS’)

invitation to comment on F

"We invite comments on any of the points made in this section, and also on the Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at Annex B which discusses the possible impact on extending coverage to the bodies concerned.

In particular we invite you to consider the following:

  • Are there any factual inaccuracies in our analysis?
  • Is there a case either for or against extending coverage to ACPOS that you wish to make?
  • Are you able to provide any evidence to support your arguments?
  • Are there any other points that you wish to make, particularly on the partial Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at Annex B?"

draft response to F

G: Contractors who build, manage and maintain trunk roads under private finance contracts

invitation to comment on G

"We invite comments on any of the points made in this section, and also on the Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at Annex B which discusses the possible impact on extending coverage to the bodies concerned.

In particular we invite you to consider the following:

  • Are there any factual inaccuracies in our analysis?
  • Is there a case either for or against extending coverage to contractors who build, manage and maintain trunk roads under private finance contracts that you wish to make?
  • Are you able to provide any evidence to support your arguments?
  • Are there any other points you wish to make, particularly on the partial Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment at Annex B?"


draft response to G