FS50097811: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:04, 3 May 2010

Case Ref: FS50097811
Date: 04/09/2007
Public Authority: Financial Services Authority
Summary: 2000 (“FSMA”) as the relevant statutory bar. The Commissioner, after investigation and upon considering the relevant documents, finds that the FSA were correct in their application of the exemption.
View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 44 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{DNSummaryBox
+	{{DNSummaryBox
 |dn_ref=FS50097811
 |dn_date=04/09/2007
 |dn_pa=Financial Services Authority
-|dn_summary=The complainant sought information from the Financial Services Authority (�FSA�) that was generated by and/or considered during the FSA investigation of his complaint against HSBC Investment Bank plc. The FSA refused to disclose certain information relying on section 44 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 citing section 348 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (�FSMA�) as the relevant statutory bar. The Commissioner, after investigation and upon considering the relevant documents, finds that the FSA were correct in their application of the exemption.
+|dn_summary= 2000 (“FSMA”) as the relevant statutory bar. The Commissioner, after investigation and upon considering the relevant documents, finds that the FSA were correct in their application of the exemption.
 |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs50097811.pdf
 }}
 {{DNDecision
-|1=FOI 44
+|dnd_section=FOI 17
-|2=Not upheld
+|dnd_finding=Upheld
+}}
+{{DNDecision
+|dnd_section=FOI 44
+|dnd_finding=Not upheld
 }}