FS50074993: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(XML import)
(CSV import)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50074993
|dn_ref=FS50074993
|dn_date=05/10/2005
|dn_date=5 October 2005
|dn_pa=Ashcombe Primary School
|dn_pa=Ashcombe Primary School
|dn_summary=The complainant requested copies of all correspondence regarding the felling of trees at the School. The School did not confirm or deny whether the information specified in the request was held within the 20 working day time limit. The Decision Notice identified the breach but did not require any steps to be taken as a response was subsequently provided.
|dn_summary=The complainant requested copies of all correspondence regarding the felling of trees at the School. The School did not confirm or deny whether the information specified in the request was held within the 20 working day time limit. The Decision Notice identified the breach but did not require any steps to be taken as a response was subsequently provided.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/74993_dn.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/74993_dn.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision1
|dnd_section=FOI 10
|dnd_section=FOI 10
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Revision as of 22:22, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50074993
  • Date: 5 October 2005
  • Public Authority: Ashcombe Primary School
  • Summary: The complainant requested copies of all correspondence regarding the felling of trees at the School. The School did not confirm or deny whether the information specified in the request was held within the 20 working day time limit. The Decision Notice identified the breach but did not require any steps to be taken as a response was subsequently provided.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Template:DNDecision1