FS50100134: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50100134 | |dn_ref=FS50100134 | ||
|dn_date=29/08/2006 | |dn_date=29/08/2006 | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
|1=FOI 17 | |dnd_section=FOI 1 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 17 | |||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:05, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50100134
- Date: 29/08/2006
- Public Authority: Doncaster and Bassetlaw NHS Trust
- Summary: The complainant requested information contained within a report following an investigation into the death of his wife. The request was refused as the information had been destroyed in line with the records management policy at the time. The Commissioner is satisfied that the public authority do not hold the information requested and did not hold it at the time the request was made. However, the Trust did breach s.17 of the Act by not providing an adequate refusal notice.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 1 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
