FS50178424: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50178424 | |dn_ref=FS50178424 | ||
|dn_date=29/09/2009 | |dn_date=29/09/2009 | ||
|dn_pa=Wakefield Metropolitan District Council | |dn_pa=Wakefield Metropolitan District Council | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary= finely balanced, he has found that section 14(1) does apply and therefore has not upheld the complaint. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50178424.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50178424.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 14 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 22:11, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50178424
- Date: 29/09/2009
- Public Authority: Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
- Summary: finely balanced, he has found that section 14(1) does apply and therefore has not upheld the complaint.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 14 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions