FS50100730: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50100730 | |dn_ref=FS50100730 | ||
|dn_date=25/01/2008 | |dn_date=25/01/2008 | ||
|dn_pa=Sussex Police | |dn_pa=Sussex Police | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary=tal information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the “Act”). Whilst there are procedural errors, which will be summarised below, the Commissioner considers that sections 40(1) and (5) of the Act and regulation 5(3) of the EIR apply and therefore the complaint is not upheld. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50100730.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50100730.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 40 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=EIR 5(3) | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 22:05, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50100730
- Date: 25/01/2008
- Public Authority: Sussex Police
- Summary: tal information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the “Act”). Whilst there are procedural errors, which will be summarised below, the Commissioner considers that sections 40(1) and (5) of the Act and regulation 5(3) of the EIR apply and therefore the complaint is not upheld.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: EIR 5(3) - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions