FS50146548: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
 
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50146548
|dn_ref=FS50146548
|dn_date=03/04/2007
|dn_date=3 April 2007
|dn_pa=Department for Transport
|dn_pa=Department for Transport
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information relating to the business interests of David Mills, the husband of Tessa Jowell MP. The public authority responded to this request stating that it did not hold the requested information, but the complainant disputed this. Following investigations, the Commissioner is satisfied that the public authority does not hold any information covered by the scope of the request. However, the Commissioner has concluded that the public authority failed to respond to the request within 20 working days and therefore breached section 10 of the Act.
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information relating to the business interests of David Mills, the husband of Tessa Jowell MP. The public authority responded to this request stating that it did not hold the requested information, but the complainant disputed this. Following investigations, the Commissioner is satisfied that the public authority does not hold any information covered by the scope of the request. However, the Commissioner has concluded that the public authority failed to respond to the request within 20 working days and therefore breached section 10 of the Act.
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 10
|dnd_section=FOI 1
|2=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 10
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:30, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50146548
  • Date: 3 April 2007
  • Public Authority: Department for Transport
  • Summary: The complainant requested information relating to the business interests of David Mills, the husband of Tessa Jowell MP. The public authority responded to this request stating that it did not hold the requested information, but the complainant disputed this. Following investigations, the Commissioner is satisfied that the public authority does not hold any information covered by the scope of the request. However, the Commissioner has concluded that the public authority failed to respond to the request within 20 working days and therefore breached section 10 of the Act.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]