FS50092310: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_fs50092310.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_fs50092310.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 1 | |dnd_section=FOI 1 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 10 | |dnd_section=FOI 10 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:25, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50092310
- Date: 7 August 2006
- Public Authority: London Borough of Lewisham
- Summary: The complainant made two requests to the public authority for information related to homelessness within Lewisham. The public authority responded to the first request by supplying some of the information that had been requested but then failed to respond to the complainant's second request. Despite attempts by the Commissioner to resolve the case informally the public authority still delayed disclosing the information. The council are now required to disclose the outstanding information from the first request and respond to the complainant's second request, or else issue a refusal notice in accordance with section 17 of the Act, within 35 days of the date of this notice.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 1 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
