FS50092024: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50092024 | |dn_ref=FS50092024 | ||
|dn_date= | |dn_date=2 March 2006 | ||
|dn_pa=University of Ulster | |dn_pa=University of Ulster | ||
|dn_summary=On 13 May 2005 the complainant requested information from the University of Ulster relating to a series of homophobic incidents at the Jordanstown campus, and also asked for a copy of the university's complaints procedure. Following the intervention of the Commissioner the University released the information 16 November, six months after the initial request. The Commissioner has therefore judged that the University was in breach of s.10 of the Act by not responding with the 20 working day time limit. | |dn_summary=On 13 May 2005 the complainant requested information from the University of Ulster relating to a series of homophobic incidents at the Jordanstown campus, and also asked for a copy of the university's complaints procedure. Following the intervention of the Commissioner the University released the information 16 November, six months after the initial request. The Commissioner has therefore judged that the University was in breach of s.10 of the Act by not responding with the 20 working day time limit. | ||
Latest revision as of 23:25, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50092024
- Date: 2 March 2006
- Public Authority: University of Ulster
- Summary: On 13 May 2005 the complainant requested information from the University of Ulster relating to a series of homophobic incidents at the Jordanstown campus, and also asked for a copy of the university's complaints procedure. Following the intervention of the Commissioner the University released the information 16 November, six months after the initial request. The Commissioner has therefore judged that the University was in breach of s.10 of the Act by not responding with the 20 working day time limit.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 1 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
