FS50080243

From FOIwiki
Jump to: navigation, search


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50080243
  • Date: 15 December 2009
  • Public Authority: Department for Culture, Media and Sport
  • Summary: The complainant requested copies of correspondence exchanged between The Prince of Wales and government Ministers at the public authority over an eight month period. The complainant also requested a list and schedule of this correspondence. The public authority initially relied on the interaction of sections 37(1)(a) and 37(2) to refuse to confirm or deny whether it held any correspondence falling within the scope of the requests. During the course of the Commissioner’s investigation the public authority confirmed to the complainant that it held correspondence falling within the scope of his requests but it considered this information to be exempt from disclosure on the basis of sections 37(1)(a), 40(2) and 41(1). The public authority also stated that although it did not believe any of the information to be environmental information, if it was it would be exempt on the basis of regulations 12(5)(d), 12(5)(f) and 13(1). The public authority also confirmed that it believed that a list and/or schedule of correspondence sent by The Prince of Wales would be exempt from disclosure on the basis of sections 37(1)(a), 40(2) and 41(1) of the Act and that a list and/or schedule of information sent to The Prince of Wales would be exempt on the basis of sections 37(1)(a) and 40(2) of the Act. The Commissioner has concluded that all of the correspondence is environmental information and thus should be considered under the EIR rather than the Act. However the Commissioner has concluded that the correspondence is exempt on the basis of regulation 12(5)(f) of the EIR. The Commissioner has also concluded that a list and/or schedule of correspondence sent by The Prince of Wales are exempt on the basis of 12(5)(f) or the exemptions within the Act cited by the public authority.This decision notice is currently under appeal to the Information Tribunal.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]